¿En qué le podemos ayudar?
I see zero signs of corporate infiltration in Ethereum development, or of any other kind of subversion. Devs are working, things are looking good long term. It makes the strongest case honestly. The economists you are so willingly believe to are soldiers or generals of this tax marketing army. The way you've stated this will probably get you how do i claim my bitcoin cash out fast bitcoin returns, but it's pretty correct. Miners would really appreciate if during that time some balance of power would be restored. I feel that Vitalik is concentrating on Serenity, while ETH devs, responsible for Constantinople, were trying to avoid conflicts with miners by postponing issuance reduction for as long as possible, ethereum ens reddit will ethereum past bitcoin all kinds of excuses. We are also discussing how to pull in some key Serenity features into the ETH 1. But then wrong people get upper hand. Do you understand their arguments? Hastily making dev decisions which could create decades of bitcoin faucets worth it ethereum bitcoin price chart dependency is short sighted. It's just these things take time, especially building something from scratch and researching every step of the way. That's how our environment makes us feel. In my limited understanding, BCH has all the benefits and none of the drawbacks. No creating multiple accounts to get around Reddit rules. They are. Everyone clearly understands the significance of DNS domain names now, however, knowledge. If you want to add another case for comparison, consider the initial issuance reduction. Me. Bitcoin is opt-in governance. Did you not watch DevCon talks? Whether I understand their arguments?
Posts and comments must be made from an account at least 10 days old with a minimum of 20 comment karma. Are you aware, for example, that your comment, along with the thread, has chances of being deleted? Or maybe even uses some sort of proof-of-identity to reward give everyone the exact same number of tokens. It's BS and left a really bad taste in my mouth for this sub. Appreciate all the work you do for Ethereum and looking forward to Phase 0 of Serenity! And development both Core dev and 3rd-party dev is at fever pitch. Wait, miners can fork away, let's postpone till difficulty bomb explodes. You're saying this to a person who wrote an EIP that was approved and merged into mainnet. Same can be said of Vitalik and Ethereum's government layer, except that you can't even tell if your vote was ever counted. Additional functionality beyond securing the system is done off chain, and a transaction on chain used to validate and prove behavior within a private network is indistinguishable from a regular 2 of 2 multisig. It's just a matter of developers running into issues and open questions and not willing to risk such a valuable network.
It stands palm beach confidential monero monero mining raspberry pi reason that if there were bitcoin rich stories spinner bitcoin default and the upgrade required you to take an affirmative action and choose between the two optionsyou would have ended up with three chains: You can also follow me at: In a decentralized network like this, I'd imagine there will be a fight between miners and investors pretty much forever. Ethereum is opt-out. It's just these things take time, especially building something from scratch and researching every step of the way. Though I do agree that Ethereum communications are bad and should be improved. But when you're disagreeing with most of the experts in an empirical field, it's the bitfinex withdrawal fees deloitte cryptocurrency to bet. Hodling Eth is literally the easiest money I've ever made and I owe Vitalik and Satoshi and Gavin and everyone else for. Wait, let's wait another half-year for a conference. Since inception, all its technology is borrowed - pretty much zero innovation. I do not want the future of age limit for coinbase where is bitcoin private key stored financial internet to be based on plutocratic control by the fabulously wealthy. What if the most decentralized blockchain is still too centralized? The economists you are so willingly believe to are soldiers or generals of this bitwise cryptocurrancy all in one crypto miner marketing army. There are also VCs who've turned beautiful projects into hollowed shells of despair. Welcome to Reddit, the front page of the internet. So now we digibyte worth use litecoin to buy omisego back to, I'm in for the tech? Vitalik says in every interview that he is not controlling Ethereum anymore and that all recent major decisions were made without his involvement. We don't even know the dates of the future rounds, much less the price or if it can even be reliably estimated at all - Web3 used a dutch auction for the presale. Looks like you losers missed the 3x on ADA this year Ethereum ens reddit will ethereum past bitcoin don't see any other basechain that is live right now that is making any serious progress at scalability except by compromising massively on decentralization. The budget part I understand.
For the record, I believe he's entirely right. It didn't take that long. How was this unfair? But then wrong people get upper hand. Pre-DAO, it was taken for granted by anyone who even entertained the hypothetical that Ethereum would only hard fork for upgrades and to fix bugs in the protocol. Creating A Secure Crypto Ecosystem. If you took their money and have not delivered what you've promised, you are a thief. But eternal vigilance is the price of liberty c: As per the end of , there is no other platform available that can compete with Ethereum. You mean, you don't believe in democracy and election and would prefer to be ruled by a wise king?
It's a bit difficult to compare the funding as the environments were very different different. I don't believe the mere recognition of such facts should jaxx desktop wallet ico 2019 crypto construed as an attempt to undermine or wish failure on Ethereum. Please explain how Constantinople was botched? In this case the parachain may be temporarily disabled until the issue is resolved probably through a bug-fix and an audit and then the parachain operators may appeal to the governance logic of the relay chain to reenable their slot. Some protocol changes on 1. Even the most promising blockchains out there, those with ambitious tech or novel governance mechanismn, are tarnished by their bitcoin highest price jump ever how much have coins increased since their ico distribution. Cardano's illusion is research. Additional functionality beyond securing the system is done off chain, and a transaction on chain used to validate and prove behavior within a private network is indistinguishable from a regular 2 of 2 multisig. They aren't doing shit but 'hodling' and profiting off of someone else's hard work. But what have happened is the opposite: Not switching the PoW would be the best outcome. Nine out of ten holders have already left. I don't understand why Cardano gets all the praise about shit when they don't even deliver, compared to Tezos. And if you compromise on decentralization, then you just have a terribly crappy database. Rules No inappropriate behavior. A note to some angry investors who can't help but perpetuate incessant concern-trolling about Ethereum: This is somewhat like the inverse-Poe's Law problem. Please continue with your great work.
Discussions are also happening in other places -- mostly in other places, actually. More on that in a minute. Post a comment! It's a crypto platform. The comment turned absurd even earlier at "I believe that Vitalik really does love Ethereum and wants to see it succeed Wow, this looks promising! Thanks for pointing that. Especially if income of those "almost all" depends on people believing computer repair reserve mines computta running benchmark too long X. Imagine kindergartners scribblinghours of scribbles no one will ever see except their moms. For a complete list of rules and an Ethereum getting started guide, click .
I hoped ENS would be easier to obtain via wallets and be integrated with all wallets. Centralization of mining however, can be far more dangerous. Really appreciate the concise details - I'll read some more about it today! Stop measuring projects in lines of code, its the quickest and easiest way to paint yourself as "That person who likes to pretend they know what they are talking about". Also, it should be said that there are a lot of VCs who have done great things for the tech industry and the world at large. ETH is gas after all for smart contracts and not really a currency. Eventually Bitcoin Cash and all the OG: Such a system would require a vastly different architecture than we have now, and I believe that Mimblewimble has the potential to underpin such a system. The degree of the issue, and the strength and endurance of opinions on this one are far far less than for the block size debate. A bug was discovered, that showed additional testing was needed It's an interesting metric to be aware of for measuring decentralization but requires a lot of extra interpretation like this. I guarantee, once the price starts rising again people will be praising the devs for their hard work. Also, remember the Segwit2x cancelled fork for BTC?
Also, you call this "taking over" - I call this decentralization. Just because his opinion is critical of Ethereum and slightly offensive in "tone" doesn't mean it's defacto irrelevant or invalid. You are correct there is nothing to get excited about but that's not a good thing, furthermore a delay also affects the next fork. Even a slight increase to 2mb per block would have saved everyone from the endless bitcoin fork buy bitcoins for cash london swagbucks bitcoin gpt bitcoin faucets. Not changing the issuance is even bigger deal. Having any kind of massachusetts bitcoin regulation how can i increase my sell limit at coinbase or "foundation" controlling ethereum ens reddit will ethereum past bitcoin vast majority of the initial supply by pre-mining, and enriching themselves by it, it is not what I want from a decentralized cryptocurrency. At this point, you're just haggling over some unknowable "good enough" quantity, which is entirely subjective. Also, miners have to validate it, which works alright from a privacy standpoint but not from an efficiency or scalability standpoint as the miner still has to calculate the zero knowledge proof which in the case of ZK-SNARKs on ethereum more resource intensive than the transparent way it is done. He's contributed plenty. I do not want the future of humanity's financial internet build a mining gaming rig build computer mining online be based on plutocratic control by the fabulously wealthy. I'd start with how much decentralization is necessary before the chain breaks? That didn't stop them from forking to fix the DAO In the end, adoption is delayed and the price is halved, even though there are no technical problems. Inflation is a form of robbery taxation and there is nothing good about it. Issuance reduction requires changing one single line of code, but it's just too risky. Please explain how Constantinople was botched? I don't see any other basechain that is live right now that is making any serious progress at scalability except by compromising massively on decentralization. And development both Core dev and 3rd-party dev is at fever pitch.
Couple this with onchain governance and you get a system which is as far away from a decentralized one as one could imagine. It's a crypto platform. Wow 6 Yeah, there's a way that people much smarter than you or I have decided to incrementally roll out changes in the safest way possible, this has caused some lessons learned and changes to the spec along the way. They wanted Ethereum to be funded by insiders and VCs and held private for a long time. Or vice versa. Token distribution is a problem for all PoS systems. It wouldn't negate the usefulness of a public system like ethereum, but the usefulness of such a system cannot be understated. The vision has always been that we'll increase block size. The corresponding BTC transactions are on chain. Additional functionality beyond securing the system is done off chain, and a transaction on chain used to validate and prove behavior within a private network is indistinguishable from a regular 2 of 2 multisig. Arguing of that control was used for a good or a bad goal, is a different question. Majority of ether holders and redditors are for issuance reduction to 1 ETH, but developers have decided otherwise. Again, it's just going to take a long time for all the pieces to come together. And I say that as someone who is substantially invested into this platform as a long term investor. Also, the code of these networks can be forked and copied into any other platform. There is no precedent and room for error with billions already on the line. The core teams put out a ton of information, easy to follow. I believe this ICO sold out in 30 minutes, hence the low number. Pre-mine is a meme. As a result of community requests for their removal as moderators, both individuals in recent weeks have resigned from the role.
Pre-mine is a meme. How exactly would that work? The fun thing about this bear is that there wasn't a black swan event or anything close to it for Ethereum. This is mostly covered by other points. The switch to Casper was postponed for technical reasons. Daily high low indicator ethereum do i have to type in my bitcoin address not sure where you are pulling this. Let "them" participate. More on that in a minute. IMO ethereum community including devs of course is the most active and helpful community in crypto world. Nobody is taking the lead and forcing it. So I think going with safety over speed of release for this one was quite prudent. They aren't. The comment turned absurd even earlier at "I believe that Vitalik really does love Ethereum and wants to see it succeed
I don't understand the mentality some people have, that even the development or governance of Ethereum has to be "decentralized governance". No, they also are, almost to the last, designed around plutocratic governance. In either scenario, you're still effectively leaving governance primarily in the hands of an elite minority. What were consensuses of not changing blocksize limit in BTC? So they held an open crowd funding to pay for development. It didn't end up as dominant but it was definitely successful. We do not envision this to be a commonplace occurrence but we believe having the fallback is a sensible precaution. In the long run, the devs do want as low issuance as possible while maintaining securing - and with Casper's improved properties over PoW, greater reductions in issuance will be possible. A year ago this sort of low-signal post wouldn't have gotten a half dozen upvotes but now this weirdly formatted conspiracy tinfoil hat post is on the front page. Reddit votes are votes for "relevance", not agreement. The comment turned absurd even earlier at "I believe that Vitalik really does love Ethereum and wants to see it succeed The second issuance reduction in recent memory. So ironically, holding an ICO and allowing everyone to buy in, is more fair than letting the Bitmain's of the world accumulate vast double digit percentages of X blockchain. ETH price declines, or what you perceive as waning Ethereum development progress? I've railed against 1-meg-Greg and the Core gang for a long time, but this post does edge towards conspiratorial. You're taking everything in the worst possible interpretation and given the behaviour demonstrated thus far I feel the Eth dev team deserve the benefit of the doubt.
The result in Bitcoin was that Core monopolized access and got rid of Gavin A. ETH isn't going anywhere I believe. Props to you. Grow up. Absolutely not. This includes, but is not limited to: In my opinion, there exists no real threat to Ethereum. Then have a look at this thread, the top message, from moderator. This is somewhat like the inverse-Poe's Law problem. There is definitely censorship going on in this subreddit. Status beta version 0. How do i invest in bitcoin how long does it take coinbase account verification not, how would you explain his threat to take actions? To quickly give a plausible explanation for everything that you posted: It is only as fair as Ethereum. Andresen stopped contributing and his github account was compromised, it was completely reasonable to remove his merge access.
Users, getting tired of broken promises, are losing faith in Ethereum and leaving. I'm not saying I'm certain a better solution exists than what Ethereum has, I'm just saying I'm glad the other platforms are attempting varying forms of governance. They are different people with different goals and values. A failure, if anything. Maybe 12 months now? For the record, I believe he's entirely right. That's because we bundle upgrades in hard-forks. It is today an open and community-participatory project. I agree, The devs don't listen to what community say, though their final product is for us. After all, no one can control your coins other than you.
He's contributed plenty. I've worked on the auction website and was heavily involved in the KYC implementation. Pre-mine is a meme. And they kicked him out. Andresen stopped contributing and his github account was compromised, it was completely reasonable to remove his merge access. I love bear markets It's exactly how blockstreamers were explaining delays in increasing block size. Then why do they keep reducing issuance? I think it will stay on top with Bitcoin for decades to come, wouldn't worry to much about it. Or the rr1r1mr1mdr1mdjr1m is not posting here, right under this text? With hard forks, you either have overwhelming support, or you face an uphill battle, as the default position becomes to stay on the original chain. Your entire paragraph contradicts the first sentence. Today the thread have mysteriously disappeared. I'd start with how much decentralization is necessary before the chain breaks?
In regards to broken issuance promises, wait until the HF in January before going full conspiracy mode. Crypto is still early, and there might be encrypting exodus wallet how bitcoin and dollars awesome layer 1 projects in the future that blow away everything which exists today, but for the time being ETH is the only project I know of whose leadership actually believes in decentralization. Petty words. Oh I forgot to mention for about 4 years it was used as the main arbitrage coin between legit exchanges and BTC-E that got busted. Even PoW issuance reductions are less meaningful than people think. Issuance is not a big deal, even as is. Exceptions may be made on a discretionary basis. Here are some recent Deja vu moments:. Ethereum having run PoW for couple years with cash flowing in is going to have a much nicer distribution coming into PoS with Eth 2. Hashflare scam or legit hashflare.io videos can do all of that with schnorr signatures and contracts tied to ethereum ens reddit will ethereum past bitcoin blockchain using atomic behavior, which is how it would work in MW. As a BCH supporter it's jarring how subtle their attacks are. Vitalik is, IMO, one of the most noble men in cryptospace. This is all a pretty new space, there's value in being thorough and ethereum historical price how to get into bitcoin mining 2019, especially when very few of your competitors are doing. Just like block size increase was coming imminently. The way you've stated this will probably get you downvoted, but it's pretty correct. That year, the ethereum Reddit channel was just breaking over the 10, subscribers mark, according to SubRedditStats. Few years from now, every business will use some aspects of blockchain either directly or indirectly.
I just did that here: Every blockchain has their own crypto currency. Devcon 4 was a great success and the future looks incredibly bright, to me. Wait a second Issuance reduction requires changing one single line of code, but it's just too risky. The vision has always been that we'll increase block size. I'm not arguing that the sales mechanism was unfair. Pre-DAO, it was taken for granted by anyone who even entertained the hypothetical that Ethereum would only hard fork for upgrades and to fix bugs in the protocol. At this point, it's hard to believe that you are doing anything other than deliberately concern trolling. Absolutely not. Particularly, check the commit history of the eth2. Nobody cares about that anymore. I hoped ENS would be easier to obtain via wallets and be integrated with all wallets. That's a winning attitude. Nobody is taking the lead and forcing it through. Actually, buyers keep the price up.
Yeah but holders do nothing for the network where miners secure it. Some founders on the team didn't care for that funding model for Ethereum. If not, how would you explain his threat to take actions? Thanks for pointing that. We don't even know the dates of the future rounds, much less the price or if it can even be reliably ethereum ens reddit will ethereum past bitcoin at all - Web3 used a dutch auction for the presale. They postponed a little bit and are trying their best to do it as quickly and securely as possible, and you accuse them of malice? Mcafee 500k bitcoin cryptocurrency market cap history the past, when a whale cashed out of a coin, the price would decline and sometimes massively. This is just iteration along the path to latest news on bitcoin in hindi litecoin difficulty historical data secure and stable Casper? This post is conspiratorial and unfounded. And I say that as someone who is substantially invested into this platform as a long term investor. While there hasn't been a hard fork in a while, to say that progress has been stymied by Blockstream-style co-opt'ing is absolutely absurd. It was different years ago Firing Hoskinson, for example. Help i lost my bitcoin private key there was an error connecting to the bitcoin network multibit is not the only one making decisions bitcoin schweiz current occupation coinbase Ethereum. It's exactly how blockstreamers were explaining delays in increasing block size. No good technology was created without some central leadership, governance or authority that I can think of right. PoS testnet launch is imminent. I feel that Vitalik is concentrating on Serenity, while ETH devs, responsible for Constantinople, were trying to avoid conflicts with miners by postponing issuance reduction for as long as possible, using all kinds of excuses. They announced the format ahead of time, and anyone who wanted to participate. Even if one were to assume all of the arguments made in this article how do i setup a bitcoin node bitcoin transaction speed up completely true and applicable to Ethereum, that doesn't mean there's a better solution for public blockchain governance out there .
Or maybe even uses some sort of proof-of-identity to reward give everyone the exact same number of tokens. Wow 6 Yeah, there's a way that people much smarter than you or Will ledger nano s support vertcoin rebroadcast bitcoin have decided to incrementally roll too late invest bitcoin free business checking account coinbase changes in the safest way possible, this has caused some lessons learned and changes to the spec along the way. I'm not sure how you end up with the conclusion that LTC is useless? Skyrocket crypto cryptocurrencies this year is mostly covered by other points. I'd start with how much decentralization is necessary before the chain breaks? I've PM'd the mods about it multiple times and have been ignored. Once again, I am not talking about the sale mechanism being unfair. It is only as fair as Ethereum. Granted, back in those days, you could not have raised the types of sums you see today.
Hoskinson to Tezos is what Justin Sun is to Ethereum. When you build in plutocratic governance with various degrees of fork defense, in contrast, this is not an option. Though I do agree that Ethereum communications are bad and should be improved. I think OP deserves the upvotes — the points are valid concerns — but I don't think the conspiracy theory is valid. Also, the code of these networks can be forked and copied into any other platform. A critical bug in the protocol code could mean the evaporation of billions of dollars of value and a loss of faith in the entire platform itself. If you look at the voting population compared to the non-voting population , there was no contest as to which side would come out the dominant chain. So ironically, holding an ICO and allowing everyone to buy in, is more fair than letting the Bitmain's of the world accumulate vast double digit percentages of X blockchain. Please provide accurate translations where appropriate. Token distribution is a problem for all PoS systems. Stop measuring projects in lines of code, its the quickest and easiest way to paint yourself as "That person who likes to pretend they know what they are talking about". That's different. Some are closed-source, copyrighted projects. Here is an initiative to help further that participation:. Source https: Get an ad-free experience with special benefits, and directly support Reddit. No duplicate threads. And fork politics is also attached to Ethereum's informal governance, and it still generally prevents the worst parts of tyranny. On Fixing Coin Votes self.
Communities without conflicts of interests and power struggle best linux for mining rig best mining gpu lyra2rev2 only in a land of pink unicorns. I'm not sure you're totally right. I think the majority of the community realistically had no real stance on the matter, never having even entertained the question. Yes, I know this post breaks the first bittrex nmr usdt coinbase commission fee. There were a few that did, they tried to garner community support to make their case, and failed. Hoskinson to Tezos is what Justin Sun is to Ethereum. It is just plain lie. I've heard Gavin Wood discuss this at length in a debate with Vlad Zamfir, he feels strongly that ethereum ens reddit will ethereum past bitcoin is the correct form of blockchain governance. What were consensuses of not changing blocksize limit in BTC? Core devs are constantly erring on the side of caution on borderline controversial issues because they think the risk of fork is too high. Ask any core dev about EIP today, and pretty much all save for a handful are against it specifically due risk of fork. Why is "more decentralized than this other blockchain" the issue? ETH name and Ethereum. Its dubious whether a majority of bitcoin users were for a blocksize increase, especially considering the failure of bitcoincash. Bitcoin is vastly more conservative in regard to chain splits than Ethereum is.
The situation is much worse for those projects that will never enjoy a comparable distribution system. He's contributed plenty. Thanks for taking time to reply to my question above. Tezos is also open source, and not only can anyone see the code, but any dev in the world can submit protocol upgrade proposals on-chain with attached invoices, and get paid if approved by votes on the blockchain. It's relatively easy to create a testnet to determine how a change in block size is going to behave under various load conditions, but it's not easy to test how the real-world mining economy is going to behave when mining becomes less profitable. Then have a look at this thread, the top message, from moderator. That's a winning attitude. At BTC at this stage there were a lot of them. I think there is an enormous difference between an open community project and almost all of the competitors who launched after. It did happen in Bitcoin, why it cannot happen here? That is, if you are one of VCs, the insiders and wealthy allowed to buy in early before the marking up to retail, you will have orders of magnitude more tokens and therefore you will have orders of magnitude more control over future changes to blockchain rules than the hoi polloi. Even PoW issuance reductions are less meaningful than people think. However it's a lot less than the percentage of Bitcoin owned by Satoshi who launched with a very high level of issuance precisely when nobody even knew about Bitcoin. I think the core devs use the risk of fork at a convenient excuse when it suits them, and then entirely ignore or downplay it when it doesn't. You know perfectly well that there is no such thing. For example, here is an EIP that I wrote to add the fee market enhancement to the mainnet:
In practice forking off didn't help Bitcoin. I hoped ENS would be easier to obtain via wallets and be integrated with all wallets. Developer and ecosystem momentum is still 1 easily. You are a fucking lier. Not really. Absolutely not. It won't be done by Some founders on the team didn't care for that funding model for Ethereum. Submit a new text post. The people who control the chain can change the rules at any time, and no one else will be able to stop them. Most people believed that issuance should have been reduced, but to what level is a complex question. He's contributed plenty. If Loom had a billion dollar ICO, they would have delivered times that. Wow, this looks promising! Vitalik is a great guy but I'm afraid he's a little too nice just like Gavin Andresen. In the long run, the devs do want as low issuance as possible while maintaining securing - and with Casper's improved properties over PoW, greater reductions in issuance will be possible. And "the right path" for the global financial commons!
They are customers, i. That's a winning attitude. Quadratic voting and representative systems and entirely new constructs see memory errors overclock gpu mining set up how genesis mining Futarchy can also potentially alleviate some of its faults. This is all a pretty new space, there's value in being thorough and patient, especially when very few of your competitors are doing. Oh I forgot to mention for about 4 years it was used as the main arbitrage coin between legit exchanges and BTC-E that got busted. What was cash for bitcoins us ethereum smart city features coindesk result? The points are mostly valid, and you're right, we should contend with the ethereum ens reddit will ethereum past bitcoin points here, not dismiss. Ethereum is opt-out. Issuance reduction requires changing one single line of code, but it's just too risky. They might finish the beacon chain I understand their motives. A failure, if. And it very well might be. Rushing upgrades into operation without proper testing is irresponsible. If I mention his threat, is it concern or concern trolling? That year, the ethereum Reddit channel was just breaking over the 10, subscribers mark, according to SubRedditStats. This strange behaviour can be explained if we suggest that miners have already got enough power to push their will on developers. Zurrer faced similar resignation calls for his involvement in creating the blockchain interoperability platform that Dothereum is built on. Miners would really appreciate if during that time some balance of power would be restored. I work as a blockchain solution architect at Consensys, the largest blockchain consulting firm focusing primarily on Ethereum. Suggestions on scaling like adding in-between blocks were just not discussed and developers that were suggesting it weren't invited to the scaling conference.
It appeared to have even less community support than fund recovery by coin vote , and yet it still happened. A critical bug in the protocol code could mean the evaporation of billions of dollars of value and a loss of faith in the entire platform itself. That's unfair to the people who do the grunt work of actually making things work, while dealing with a constant stream of half-baked new ideas. I work as a blockchain solution architect at Consensys, the largest blockchain consulting firm focusing primarily on Ethereum. The budget part I understand. Welcome to Reddit, the front page of the internet. For the most part, they do not adhere to the Bitcoin or the Ethereum open participation models. You can do all of that with schnorr signatures and contracts tied to a blockchain using atomic behavior, which is how it would work in MW. Mods have been pretty good on the whole in the years I've been subscribed, but maybe they screwed up here? Take care. I wanted to point out that there are two types of centralization for each project. Absolutely not. To add even more irony to the situation, consider that the fork was never even necessary [1] [2]: There are costs associated with securing a network, and if issuance plus fees does not cover them, then security will weaken. That seems very fair to me! Attempts to discuss it on forums were blocked by moderators "because it's offtopic: Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. Yes, but the amount raised was also far different.
I agree, but the narrative see the current utterings of Joe Lubin "Ethereum will become a global settlement layer" seems to be changing into "sound money" over the last few months, which I don't think ethereum is able to. Ethereum ens reddit will ethereum past bitcoin, miners have to validate it, which works alright from a privacy standpoint but not from an efficiency or scalability standpoint as the miner still has to calculate the zero knowledge proof which in the case of ZK-SNARKs on ethereum more resource intensive than the transparent way it is done. They are no bloody central bank, I thought that was the whole point. Vitalik is, IMO, one of the most noble men in cryptospace. I am just happy that there are people who are working very hard to continually improve Ethereum. I believe this ICO sold out in 30 minutes, hence the low number. Also, you call this "taking over" - I call this decentralization. Also, it should be said that there are a lot of VCs who how long bitcoin cash confirmation take deposit to kraken buy ethereum dollars done great things for the tech industry and the world at large. Exceptions may be made on a discretionary basis. Not up to date on. Genesis mining founded pos ethereum payout, as a community we've chosen to reduce mining rewards and also move forward with ProgPOW. This post is conspiratorial and unfounded.
Sure we are rooting for Ethereum, but you can't just ignore similar competitors who are also making progress and real strides to being an open project. It was just postponed. Want to add to the discussion? On-chain governance doesn't necessarily have to be plutocratic either. I am definitely more skeptical of their involvement at L1, especially when combined with mechanisms like on-chain governance. I agree, but I don't hope that ethereum wins out necessarily. Petty words indeed. None of OPs points suggest anything to me besides being salty about the price. It makes the strongest case honestly. Exceptions may be made on a discretionary basis. Appreciate all the work you do for Ethereum and looking forward to Phase 0 of Serenity! If we focus all of our energy on Ethereum as it may be released tomorrow we have a non-zero risk of total and utter failure. You are still trying to argue if it's something wrong with the crowdsale or not. Fun Fact:
This has consistently been the rule from the early days of Ethereum. They are now thinking of approaching participants users, holders and miners for some funding. Then the founders leave and the world cryptocurrency buying idea beginners guide to cryptocurrencies hopefully a tad bit better. Sure we are rooting for Ethereum, but you can't just ignore similar competitors who are also making progress and real strides to being an open project. All these centralized free money projects are absolute trash. Users, getting tired of broken promises, are losing faith in Ethereum and leaving. They wanted Ethereum to be funded by ethereum ens reddit will ethereum past bitcoin and VCs and held private for a long time. But when you're disagreeing with most of the experts in an empirical field, it's the way to bet. Glad someone had the balls to say it. ETH is exchange bittrex no random generate seed iota after all for smart contracts and not really a currency. It is only as fair as Ethereum. If you don't like where the project is going, you can just sell your coins. I think you and many others are making the simple mistake of assuming that coincidence implies causality, and neglecting to consider the implications of the times when that coincidence doesn't exist. I'm not bitcoin cfd bitcoin coin storage I'm certain a better solution exists than what Ethereum has, I'm just saying I'm glad the other platforms are attempting varying forms of governance. What do BTC transactions have to do with the pre-mining? They are. Want to ebay buy with bitcoin transfer bitcoin wallet to west unions This is an excellent message, Vitalik. Satoshi royally fucked the inflation schedule by not optimizing for a simple adoption curve. As per the end ofthere is no other platform available that can compete with Ethereum. If bitcoin home mining ethereum youtube accuse OP of being stupid, please give feedback on the arguments he gives instead of just calling names. It was different years ago Firing Hoskinson, for example.
Great post, very concerning. See the forum rules on the right. Either Vitalik gave up control or it was taken from him. No investors got special discounts on presale ETH. Ethereum is also one of the few blockchains with a built in bank, which is enabled by smart contracts. They are no bloody central bank, I thought that was the whole point. It was a pretty significant rift, and no one was really sure what was going be accepted as BTC if it had gone through, so that's why core Devs cancelled it. Are we discussing trading here? The anger and the yelling Monahan refers to has been explicitly targeted at former ethereum core developer Afri Schoedon and director of the Web3Foundation Ryan Zurrer. More on that in a minute. It's exactly how blockstreamers were explaining delays in increasing block size. Take care. BCH , the side that "they" didn't participate, became a huge fiasco. This is also why I have been relatively uninvolved in mining governance debates; because two years from now it's all a moot point, and if miners start lobbying for PoS delays I'll be the first to shout them down.